<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Times: Waterfront plan could be headed to ballot in Hercules</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.waterfrontwatch.org/archives/2008/07/times-waterfront-plan-could-be-headed-to-ballot-in-hercules.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.waterfrontwatch.org/archives/2008/07/times-waterfront-plan-could-be-headed-to-ballot-in-hercules.html</link>
	<description>Neighbors protecting neighbors in the Hercules Waterfront.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 16:50:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JLBoore</title>
		<link>http://www.waterfrontwatch.org/archives/2008/07/times-waterfront-plan-could-be-headed-to-ballot-in-hercules.html#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>JLBoore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 04:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waterfrontwatch.org/wp/archives/2008/07/times-waterfront-plan-could-be-headed-to-ballot-in-hercules.html#comment-31</guid>
		<description>The article was useful and informative, but I&#039;m concerned that it implied that the controversy over the placement of the train station was the most significant cause of these long delays in the project and that the &quot;Szabo Plan&quot; had been proposed as a solution. Actually, the initial objections by Union Pacific to placing the station on the curve were quickly resolved, and all parties have agreed on its location farther to the north for several years. The reasons for hiring George Szabo and having him design a train station north of the creek remain mysterious, but this was the cause of the last year of delay, not in any way even intended as a solution to the non-existent problem of train station location.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article was useful and informative, but I&#8217;m concerned that it implied that the controversy over the placement of the train station was the most significant cause of these long delays in the project and that the &#8220;Szabo Plan&#8221; had been proposed as a solution. Actually, the initial objections by Union Pacific to placing the station on the curve were quickly resolved, and all parties have agreed on its location farther to the north for several years. The reasons for hiring George Szabo and having him design a train station north of the creek remain mysterious, but this was the cause of the last year of delay, not in any way even intended as a solution to the non-existent problem of train station location.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
