<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sycamore North Ground Breaking Today</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.waterfrontwatch.org/archives/2009/05/sycamore-north-ground-breaking-today.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.waterfrontwatch.org/archives/2009/05/sycamore-north-ground-breaking-today.html</link>
	<description>Neighbors protecting neighbors in the Hercules Waterfront.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 05:35:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Waterfront Watch &#187; Sycamore Downtown Slowed Down By Contracting</title>
		<link>http://www.waterfrontwatch.org/archives/2009/05/sycamore-north-ground-breaking-today.html#comment-13842</link>
		<dc:creator>Waterfront Watch &#187; Sycamore Downtown Slowed Down By Contracting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waterfrontwatch.org/?p=2403#comment-13842</guid>
		<description>[...] gap in construction phasing has resulted in a stalled state of construction for the Sycamore Downtown/North project. The contracting and phasing aspects of the contract was subcontracted to a construction management [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] gap in construction phasing has resulted in a stalled state of construction for the Sycamore Downtown/North project. The contracting and phasing aspects of the contract was subcontracted to a construction management [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.waterfrontwatch.org/archives/2009/05/sycamore-north-ground-breaking-today.html#comment-5373</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 19:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waterfrontwatch.org/?p=2403#comment-5373</guid>
		<description>Does anybody know whether the flyer, which was distributed to our communities regarding this development, came from the City, the developer, or some other entity?  Not sure of the source or validity of that info, and that&#039;s the only place I&#039;ve heard of the mass low income housing in the new development.  If true, I&#039;m only concerned by  the screening process, or lack thereof. 

As with all social programs, there are some good people who really need this and some bad people who take advantage. In Baywood, the City did an excellent job of incorporating low income housing into the community and properly screening low income applicants so that hard working, well-deserving individuals and families could live in the community.  As far as I can tell they&#039;ve made great neighbors and bring much needed socio-economic diversity to our community. 

However, since the low income housing proposed in the new development seems to be planned as rentals, I worry the City won&#039;t oversee the screening process here as they once did in Baywood. I do think a lack of City oversite could enable those individuals who are frauds and who take advantage of the program to move into the units. If the City stays involved in this process, however, I think it has a great chance at succeeding. So any news yet on how the screening process will work for these low income units?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anybody know whether the flyer, which was distributed to our communities regarding this development, came from the City, the developer, or some other entity?  Not sure of the source or validity of that info, and that&#8217;s the only place I&#8217;ve heard of the mass low income housing in the new development.  If true, I&#8217;m only concerned by  the screening process, or lack thereof. </p>
<p>As with all social programs, there are some good people who really need this and some bad people who take advantage. In Baywood, the City did an excellent job of incorporating low income housing into the community and properly screening low income applicants so that hard working, well-deserving individuals and families could live in the community.  As far as I can tell they&#8217;ve made great neighbors and bring much needed socio-economic diversity to our community. </p>
<p>However, since the low income housing proposed in the new development seems to be planned as rentals, I worry the City won&#8217;t oversee the screening process here as they once did in Baywood. I do think a lack of City oversite could enable those individuals who are frauds and who take advantage of the program to move into the units. If the City stays involved in this process, however, I think it has a great chance at succeeding. So any news yet on how the screening process will work for these low income units?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Keeffe</title>
		<link>http://www.waterfrontwatch.org/archives/2009/05/sycamore-north-ground-breaking-today.html#comment-4910</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Keeffe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 04:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waterfrontwatch.org/?p=2403#comment-4910</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m overwhelmed by this its much larger than I expected I&#039;m concerned about crime increasing as well I hope the city will be enlarging our police department to match the increased population including problems dense low cost housing brings this has aspects of a glorified &quot;projects&quot; to me I&#039;m concerned</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m overwhelmed by this its much larger than I expected I&#8217;m concerned about crime increasing as well I hope the city will be enlarging our police department to match the increased population including problems dense low cost housing brings this has aspects of a glorified &#8220;projects&#8221; to me I&#8217;m concerned</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
