<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Station Design Reaches Major Milestone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.waterfrontwatch.org/archives/2009/09/station-design-reaches-major-milestone.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.waterfrontwatch.org/archives/2009/09/station-design-reaches-major-milestone.html</link>
	<description>Neighbors protecting neighbors in the Hercules Waterfront.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:20:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Duck Pond Park &#8212; Waterfront Watch</title>
		<link>http://www.waterfrontwatch.org/archives/2009/09/station-design-reaches-major-milestone.html#comment-23045</link>
		<dc:creator>The Duck Pond Park &#8212; Waterfront Watch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 00:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waterfrontwatch.org/?p=3825#comment-23045</guid>
		<description>[...] if the hill remained as is, so would this great vista location (which would include sight of the future Intermodal Station tower as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] if the hill remained as is, so would this great vista location (which would include sight of the future Intermodal Station tower as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: City&#8217;s Presentation to BCDC Suggests Café Building Redesign &#8212; Waterfront Watch</title>
		<link>http://www.waterfrontwatch.org/archives/2009/09/station-design-reaches-major-milestone.html#comment-19252</link>
		<dc:creator>City&#8217;s Presentation to BCDC Suggests Café Building Redesign &#8212; Waterfront Watch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 03:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waterfrontwatch.org/?p=3825#comment-19252</guid>
		<description>[...] and handsome structure that would fit in well with the modern arched station building (which is an interpretation of a train shed), however be significantly different and unique (adding to the eclectic nature and intent of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and handsome structure that would fit in well with the modern arched station building (which is an interpretation of a train shed), however be significantly different and unique (adding to the eclectic nature and intent of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Waterfront Watch &#187; City Unveils Uninspired, Inexplicable Plaza Building Design</title>
		<link>http://www.waterfrontwatch.org/archives/2009/09/station-design-reaches-major-milestone.html#comment-16273</link>
		<dc:creator>Waterfront Watch &#187; City Unveils Uninspired, Inexplicable Plaza Building Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 17:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waterfrontwatch.org/?p=3825#comment-16273</guid>
		<description>[...] team themselves reinforced, stating that matching them will reduce confusion for commuters. (The station tower, of course, is 85 feet high, and will not me missed from any vantage point in the Waterfront, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] team themselves reinforced, stating that matching them will reduce confusion for commuters. (The station tower, of course, is 85 feet high, and will not me missed from any vantage point in the Waterfront, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Waterfront Watch &#187; Szabo No Longer Under Contract</title>
		<link>http://www.waterfrontwatch.org/archives/2009/09/station-design-reaches-major-milestone.html#comment-14571</link>
		<dc:creator>Waterfront Watch &#187; Szabo No Longer Under Contract</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waterfrontwatch.org/?p=3825#comment-14571</guid>
		<description>[...] planner, George Szabo had virtually no input in the final process for the ultimate design of the train station. Money well [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] planner, George Szabo had virtually no input in the final process for the ultimate design of the train station. Money well [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Waterfront Watch &#187; City Council Chooses Alternative 1</title>
		<link>http://www.waterfrontwatch.org/archives/2009/09/station-design-reaches-major-milestone.html#comment-13524</link>
		<dc:creator>Waterfront Watch &#187; City Council Chooses Alternative 1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waterfrontwatch.org/?p=3825#comment-13524</guid>
		<description>[...] expected, the City Council unanimously recommended Alternative 1 as the preferred intermodal station design last night. The process has come to an [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] expected, the City Council unanimously recommended Alternative 1 as the preferred intermodal station design last night. The process has come to an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Waterfront Watch &#187; Reflections on the Process, New Urbanism</title>
		<link>http://www.waterfrontwatch.org/archives/2009/09/station-design-reaches-major-milestone.html#comment-13351</link>
		<dc:creator>Waterfront Watch &#187; Reflections on the Process, New Urbanism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 18:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waterfrontwatch.org/?p=3825#comment-13351</guid>
		<description>[...] original Szabo plan would have destroyed New Urbanism in the Waterfront. (What we have now is a far cry from the Szabo plan. The station will be impressive architecturally and a part of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] original Szabo plan would have destroyed New Urbanism in the Waterfront. (What we have now is a far cry from the Szabo plan. The station will be impressive architecturally and a part of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Waterfront Watch &#187; Commission Recommends Alternative 1</title>
		<link>http://www.waterfrontwatch.org/archives/2009/09/station-design-reaches-major-milestone.html#comment-13316</link>
		<dc:creator>Waterfront Watch &#187; Commission Recommends Alternative 1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 22:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waterfrontwatch.org/?p=3825#comment-13316</guid>
		<description>[...] night&#8217;s Planning Commission meeting, the Planning Commission slowly but surely recommended Alternative 1 after receiving a presentation on the final two alternatives from the design [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] night&#8217;s Planning Commission meeting, the Planning Commission slowly but surely recommended Alternative 1 after receiving a presentation on the final two alternatives from the design [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gloria Price</title>
		<link>http://www.waterfrontwatch.org/archives/2009/09/station-design-reaches-major-milestone.html#comment-12866</link>
		<dc:creator>Gloria Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 23:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waterfrontwatch.org/?p=3825#comment-12866</guid>
		<description>Hey Mike, I love it!!!  If my memory serves me right, there is an old saying something like &quot;a camel is a horse designed by a committee&quot;.  Well, the end result of this group is they designed a beautiful, functional train station.  Worth all the discussions.  I really like the tower and front stairs -- gives a good solid feel.  Thank you, Mike, for all your efforts.  Gloria</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Mike, I love it!!!  If my memory serves me right, there is an old saying something like &#8220;a camel is a horse designed by a committee&#8221;.  Well, the end result of this group is they designed a beautiful, functional train station.  Worth all the discussions.  I really like the tower and front stairs &#8212; gives a good solid feel.  Thank you, Mike, for all your efforts.  Gloria</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Waterfront Watch &#187; Missing the train, and other lessons learned riding Capitol Corridor</title>
		<link>http://www.waterfrontwatch.org/archives/2009/09/station-design-reaches-major-milestone.html#comment-12860</link>
		<dc:creator>Waterfront Watch &#187; Missing the train, and other lessons learned riding Capitol Corridor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 21:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waterfrontwatch.org/?p=3825#comment-12860</guid>
		<description>[...] of the Hercules station starts this Spring, right? Similar posts:A Capitol Corridor Story The past two days I have ridden [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the Hercules station starts this Spring, right? Similar posts:A Capitol Corridor Story The past two days I have ridden [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Bowermaster</title>
		<link>http://www.waterfrontwatch.org/archives/2009/09/station-design-reaches-major-milestone.html#comment-12824</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Bowermaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waterfrontwatch.org/?p=3825#comment-12824</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&#039;#comment-12821&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@David Smith&lt;/a&gt; - David glad to hear the architect said they are working on the front entrance specifically.  The dog-leg arch defining the right of the stairs and framing the entrance to the bay trail is currently (as I see it) the only hiccup in the latest design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='#comment-12821' rel="nofollow">@David Smith</a> &#8211; David glad to hear the architect said they are working on the front entrance specifically.  The dog-leg arch defining the right of the stairs and framing the entrance to the bay trail is currently (as I see it) the only hiccup in the latest design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.waterfrontwatch.org/archives/2009/09/station-design-reaches-major-milestone.html#comment-12821</link>
		<dc:creator>David Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waterfrontwatch.org/?p=3825#comment-12821</guid>
		<description>I completely agree with your comments Mike.

I went to the last public meeting fully intending to vote Safeway Station out of existence but was pleasantly surprised that the architects had already done so and were now presenting a very nice alternative.  Instead of voting for design four as I intended to do that night, I voted for the new design one.  There was a good size group of others who did the same (we were asked for a show of hands if our preference had changed).

I especially agree with your suggestion to let the architects follow their hearts now that many of us feel they are on the right track (no pun intended).

I spoke briefly with the architect at the last meeting and he expressed to me that the changes to design one were the best they could do in the short time that they had to come up with them, and that they recognize there is still room for improvement - one being a more well defined front entrance above the top of the stairs.

Although I now prefer design one over design four, I agree that both designs are much better than the original design one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree with your comments Mike.</p>
<p>I went to the last public meeting fully intending to vote Safeway Station out of existence but was pleasantly surprised that the architects had already done so and were now presenting a very nice alternative.  Instead of voting for design four as I intended to do that night, I voted for the new design one.  There was a good size group of others who did the same (we were asked for a show of hands if our preference had changed).</p>
<p>I especially agree with your suggestion to let the architects follow their hearts now that many of us feel they are on the right track (no pun intended).</p>
<p>I spoke briefly with the architect at the last meeting and he expressed to me that the changes to design one were the best they could do in the short time that they had to come up with them, and that they recognize there is still room for improvement &#8211; one being a more well defined front entrance above the top of the stairs.</p>
<p>Although I now prefer design one over design four, I agree that both designs are much better than the original design one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
